Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 78 - 81, 30.07.2023

Gökhan Özer Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu Abdullah Kürşat Merter

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdul Manaf, K. B., Amran, N. A., & Zainol Abidin, A. (2014). Board size and accounting conservatism of Malaysian listed firms. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 207-211.
  • Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.
  • Boozang, K. M. (2007). Does an independent board improve nonprofit corporate governance. Tennessee Literature Review, 75, 83-94.
  • Chen, C. H., & Al-Najjar, B. (2012). The determinants of board size and independence: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 21(5), 831-846.
  • Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157-176.
  • Hahn, P. D., & Lasfer, M. (2016). Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 295-308.
  • Karami, G., & BeikBoshrouyeh, S. (2011). Corporate governance and equity valuation: the model by using artificial neural network. Accounting and Auditing Review, 18(64), 129-150.
  • Almagtome, A., Khaghaany, M., & Önce, S. (2020). Corporate governance quality, stakeholders' pressure, and sustainable development: An integrated approach. International Journal of Mathematıcal Engıneerıng and Management Sciences, 5(6), 321-340.
  • Larmou, S., & Vafeas, N. (2010). The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 14, 61-85.
  • Lin, T. T., & Lee, Y. C. (2008). Organizational characteristics, board size and corporate performance. Journal of Global Business Management, 4(2), 338-347.
  • Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 283-306.
  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
  • Zakaria, M., Mabrouka, A. S., & Sarhan, S. (2014). Artificial neural network: a brief overview. Neural Networks, 1, 2-12.

DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 78 - 81, 30.07.2023

Gökhan Özer Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu Abdullah Kürşat Merter

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757

Öz

Purpose- The goal of this research is to delve into the complexities of board structure and composition within firms. Specifically, it aims to examine how various factors such as firm performance and firm-based play a role in determining the most appropriate number of board members.
Methodology- A neural network model is created to identify the ideal number of board members based on financial performance metrics. Financial performance indicators (return on assets, return on equity, profits per share, and market to book value ratio) and firm-based variables compose the model's input layer (company age, company size, total sales, and leverage). The output layer displays the ideal number of board members for each organization. The model's design has one or more hidden layers to represent the intricate interactions between the input variables and the desired output.
Findings- As compared to the other factors, the significance of the return on assets variable as a predictor is much higher. At least one of the intervals is affected by each of the eight factors, and each of those eight variables has a statistically significant influence.
Conclusion- Through a comprehensive analysis and review of existing literature, the study intends to shed light on the interplay between these factors and their impact on board effectiveness and decision-making. By exploring the relationship between firm-based factors and board composition, the research hopes to provide valuable insights and recommendations for firms looking to optimize their governance structure and improve their overall performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Board size optimal number of board members artificial neural network return on assets

Kaynakça

  • Abdul Manaf, K. B., Amran, N. A., & Zainol Abidin, A. (2014). Board size and accounting conservatism of Malaysian listed firms. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 207-211.
  • Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.
  • Boozang, K. M. (2007). Does an independent board improve nonprofit corporate governance. Tennessee Literature Review, 75, 83-94.
  • Chen, C. H., & Al-Najjar, B. (2012). The determinants of board size and independence: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 21(5), 831-846.
  • Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157-176.
  • Hahn, P. D., & Lasfer, M. (2016). Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 295-308.
  • Karami, G., & BeikBoshrouyeh, S. (2011). Corporate governance and equity valuation: the model by using artificial neural network. Accounting and Auditing Review, 18(64), 129-150.
  • Almagtome, A., Khaghaany, M., & Önce, S. (2020). Corporate governance quality, stakeholders' pressure, and sustainable development: An integrated approach. International Journal of Mathematıcal Engıneerıng and Management Sciences, 5(6), 321-340.
  • Larmou, S., & Vafeas, N. (2010). The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 14, 61-85.
  • Lin, T. T., & Lee, Y. C. (2008). Organizational characteristics, board size and corporate performance. Journal of Global Business Management, 4(2), 338-347.
  • Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 283-306.
  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
  • Zakaria, M., Mabrouka, A. S., & Sarhan, S. (2014). Artificial neural network: a brief overview. Neural Networks, 1, 2-12.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gökhan Özer 0000-0002-3255-998X

Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu 0000-0002-4810-2351

Abdullah Kürşat Merter 0000-0001-6874-1890

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Özer, G., Balcıoğlu, Y. S., & Merter, A. K. (2023). DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. PressAcademia Procedia, 17(1), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757
AMA Özer G, Balcıoğlu YS, Merter AK. DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. PAP. Temmuz 2023;17(1):78-81. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757
Chicago Özer, Gökhan, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, ve Abdullah Kürşat Merter. “DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS”. PressAcademia Procedia 17, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2023): 78-81. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757.
EndNote Özer G, Balcıoğlu YS, Merter AK (01 Temmuz 2023) DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. PressAcademia Procedia 17 1 78–81.
IEEE G. Özer, Y. S. Balcıoğlu, ve A. K. Merter, “DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS”, PAP, c. 17, sy. 1, ss. 78–81, 2023, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757.
ISNAD Özer, Gökhan vd. “DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS”. PressAcademia Procedia 17/1 (Temmuz 2023), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757.
JAMA Özer G, Balcıoğlu YS, Merter AK. DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. PAP. 2023;17:78–81.
MLA Özer, Gökhan vd. “DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS”. PressAcademia Procedia, c. 17, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 78-81, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1757.
Vancouver Özer G, Balcıoğlu YS, Merter AK. DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS: IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. PAP. 2023;17(1):78-81.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.