A JULIA KRISTEVAN ANALYSIS OF STEVIE SMITH'S POETRY
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the British poet Stevie Smith’s poetry by using Kristevan psychoanalytic theory. Smith, who wrote between the 1930s and the 1970s, was underrated throughout most of her career. Julia Kristeva’s work on the semiotic and the symbolic can explain why Smith’s poetry was underestimated in the mid-twentieth century British poetry. Smith’s language, poetic performances and themes come into conflict with the masculine symbolic discourse destroying the hierarchal boundaries between the semiotic and the symbolic. In Kristevan terms, the semiotic rebels against the oppression of the symbolic in her poetry. As a result, the masculine symbolic discourse fails to define her writing in the symbolic order and thus ends up labeling it simple and superficial.
Keywords
References
- ABRAMS, M.H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Seventh Edition. Massachusetts: Heinle&Heinle.
- ANDERSON, L. (2007). Gender, Feminism and Poetry. in Neil Corcoran (Ed.), The Cambridge 87). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- BAUMERT, R. (2007). Fear, Melancholy, and Loss in the Poetry of Stevie Smith. in Konstanze The Aestheticization of the Unaesthetic in Contemporary Literature and Culture (pp. 197-221). New York: Rodopi .
- CIXOUS, H. (1997). The Laugh of the Medusa. in Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl (Eds.), (pp.347-63). New Brunswick
- New Jersey: Rutgers UP.
- DERRIDA, J. (1993). Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. in Joseph Reader (pp.223-43). Albany: State U of
- Natoli and Linda Hutcheon (Eds.), A Postmodern New York P.
- DOWSON, J., Entwistle, A. (2005). A History of Twentieth-Century British Women’s Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
July 13, 2016
Submission Date
January 16, 2016
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 40 Number: 1