Research Article

THE ROLE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND APOCALYPSE IN THE DYSTOPIAN FICTIONS: MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN AND ALDOUS HUXLEY'S BRAVE NEW WORLD

Volume: 45 Number: 1 June 29, 2021
EN TR

THE ROLE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND APOCALYPSE IN THE DYSTOPIAN FICTIONS: MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN AND ALDOUS HUXLEY'S BRAVE NEW WORLD

Abstract

This study aims to focus on the concepts of science, technology, and apocalypse in dystopian novels. Dystopian fiction has lately become an important literary genre within speculative fiction in English and Contemporary World Literature. It is not possible to think of dystopian fiction apart from the utopian tradition, which has a long oral and written history. Therefore, In this study, after focusing on the similarities and differences of dystopian and utopian fiction, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, both of which contributed to the development of dystopian fiction as a subgenre of science fiction, will be discussed separately. Actually, it will be argued not only how both authors deal with science, technology, and apocalyptic elements in their novels but also how they criticize their own societies through the dystopian vision of these works. Moreover, the societies depicted by Shelley and Huxley will be debated to demonstrate the visible or invisible ties to the 'authority', which is thought to be the potential perpetrator of the feelings of fear, suffering and helplessness that permeate the societies.

Keywords

References

  1. Barr, B. (2010). Aldous Huxley's Brave New World—still a Chilling Vision After All These Years. Michigan Law Review, 108(6), 847-857. Retrieved March 11, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40645848
  2. Britton, R. (2015). Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: what made the Monster monstrous?. The Journal of analytical psychology, 60(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12126
  3. Castleman, R. (1994). Apocalypse. MoMA, (18), 6-11. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4381271
  4. Dutoit, T. (1994). Re-Specting the Face as the Moral (of) Fiction in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. MLN, 109(5), 847-871. doi:10.2307/2904709
  5. Gordin, M. D., Tilley, H. L., & Prakash, G. (2010). Utopia/dystopia: Conditions of historical possibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. Huxley, A. (1998). Brave New World. New York: HarperPerennial.
  7. Morgan, S., Shanahan, S., & Welsh, W. (2005). Brave New Worlds: Philosophy, Politics, and Science in Human Biotechnology. Population and Development Review, 31(1), 127-144. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3401441
  8. Potter, G. (2012). Imaginaries and Realities, Utopia and Dystopia. Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 23. Retrieved from http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/15869

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 29, 2021

Submission Date

April 15, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 15, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 45 Number: 1

APA
Tatar, S. (2021). THE ROLE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND APOCALYPSE IN THE DYSTOPIAN FICTIONS: MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN AND ALDOUS HUXLEY’S BRAVE NEW WORLD. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 45(1), 257-268. https://izlik.org/JA83ZD44JW

.