Review

A Critical Outlook on Intelligence Measurement in Old Age

Volume: 44 Number: 1 June 19, 2020
EN TR

A Critical Outlook on Intelligence Measurement in Old Age

Abstract

Important changes occur in the human being defined as biopsychosocial in its most general definition during the aging process. In parallel with biopsychosocial change, one of the subjects that has undergone a significant change in the old age is the subject of intelligence.  However, the question of "what is intelligence" is still sought and there is no consensus on the definition of this concept by scientists. There is also debate about what intelligence tests actually measure. In addition to the concept of intelligence in general, when this concept is used together with old age, the situation becomes more complicated. However, it can be said that negative stereotypes against the elderly also have negative effects on the subject of intelligence in old age. The focus of this article is on how objectively measured the intelligence scores obtained from the elderly in numerical terms by the existing tests and methods and how reliable they are to the scores obtained. It should be noted that no matter how quantitative data are obtained, these data should not be evaluated independently of the context.

Keywords

References

  1. Almond, N. M. (2014). The Use-It-Or-Lose-It Theory; The Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis and the Use-Dependency Theory: Methodological Issues, Previous Research, Current Research and Future Perspectives. K, Edison.(Ed). Episodic Memory: Formation, Clinical Disorders and Role of Aging. Nova Science Publishers, Inc: New York.
  2. Bavelier, D., Levi, D. M., Li, R. W., Dan, Y., ve Hensch, T. K. (2010). Removing brakes on adult brain plasticity: from molecular to behavioral interventions. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(45), 14964-14971.
  3. Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., ... & Unverzagt, F. W. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Jama, 288(18), 2271-2281.
  4. Cangöz, B. (2009).Yaşlılıkta bilişsel ve psikolojik değişim. Geriatrik Bilimler Uygulam ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni. 99-104.
  5. Cole, M. (1990). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: cultural psychologist. In E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the Legacy of Luria (pp. 11–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Creasey, G. L. (2005). ResearchMethods in Lifespan Development. USA: Pearson.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarpersCollins.
  8. Deary, I. J., Corley, J., Gow, A. J., Harris, S. E., Houlihan, L. M., Marioni, R. E., ... & Starr, J. M. (2009). Age-associated cognitive decline. British medical bulletin, 92(1), 135-152.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

June 19, 2020

Submission Date

September 23, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 19, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 44 Number: 1

APA
Kütük, B. (2020). YAŞLILIKTA ZEKA ÖLÇÜMÜNE ELEŞTİREL BİR BAKIŞ. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 44(1), 165-174. https://izlik.org/JA38BU38XX

.