BibTex RIS Cite

Disiplinlerarası Ortak Bir Çalışma Alanı Olarak Sosyal Sermaye

Year 2009, Volume: 33 Issue: 2, 248 - 256, 08.03.2010

Feray Erselcan

Abstract

Sosyal sermaye, insanlar arası güven, birlik ve bütünlük duygusuna dayalı olarak, işbirliği ve ortak eylem potansiyelini harekete geçirmek suretiyle birlikte çalışmayı olanaklı hale getiren, toplumsal gelişimin yanı sıra ekonomik gelişim açısından da önem arz eden bir kavramdır. Bu çalışmada sosyal sermayeyle ilgili birbirinden farklı alanlarda yürütülen araştırmalar yakın plana alınmak suretiyle, kuramsal çerçevesi üzerinde tartışmaların halen sürdüğü, bu nispeten yeni kavramın tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır. Farklı disiplinler içinde kendi kuram ve yöntemleri ile kavramı tanımlama ve ölçme çabalarını zenginleştiren bu çalışmaların aynı zamanda disiplinler arası sınırların aşılmasına yaptığı katkı ise kuşkusuz önemlidir.

Keywords

-

References

  • Adler, P. ve Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17–40.
  • Arrow, K. (2000). Observations on social capital. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (3- 5).Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Becker, G. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986), The forms of capital. Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education içinde (241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Burt, Ronald S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, Ronald, S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19, 355-374.
  • Burt, Ronald S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement) 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1999). Trust, voluntary association and workable democracy: The contemporary American discourse of civil society. Warren, M.E. (Ed.) Democracy and trust içinde (208-248). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Cooke, P.M. ve Morgan, K. (2000). The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dasgupta, P. (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (325-424). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • Dincer, O. ve Uslaner, E. (2007). Trust and growth. Nota Di Lavoro 73.2007 The Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro Series. Temmuz 2009, http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htm
  • Dobler, C. (2009). The impact of institutions, culture, and religion on per capita income. Hohenheim University Paper Nr. 28/2009, Stutgart. Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2009, http://www.socialcapitalgateway.
  • Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Esasen Dünya Değerler Araştırmaları dışında Türkiye’de sosyal sermayeyi
  • ölçme çabasına giren az sayıda çalışmaya rastlanmaktadır (örn., Secor, A.C.
  • ve O’Loughlin, J., 2005).
  • Fine, B. (2001). Social capital versus social theory: Political economy and social science at the turn of the millennium. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Flora, J. (1998). Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology, 63, 481-506.
  • Foley, M.W. ve Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 141-173.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Güven, sosyal erdemler ve refahın yaratılması. (A. Buğdaycı, Çev.) İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi: 1995.)
  • Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D. ve Sacerdote, B. (2000). The economic approach to social capital. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. 7728, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7728.
  • Grabowski, R. (1998). Development, markets and trust. Journal of International Development, 10, 357-371.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510. 15 Temmuz 2009, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199.
  • Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A Framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35 (1), 3-11.
  • Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50. 10 Temmuz 2009, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134991.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. ve Zingales, L. (2006). Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
  • Hanifan, L. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N. ve Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations; forms and facades of trust. Lane, C. ve Bachman, R. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations; conceptual issues and empirical applications içinde (64-87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huang, F. (2003). Social trust, cooperation, and human capital. Department of Economics, The University of Pennsylvania. 15 Temmuz 2009. http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~fali/hcsc815.pdf
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. Warren, M. (Ed.), Democracy and trust içinde, 88-120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., Diez-Medrano, J., Halman, L. ve Luijkx, R. (Eds.). (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999- 2002 Values Surveys, Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
  • Inglehart, R. ve Welzel, C. (2007). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. (5. Baskı). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Isham, J., Kaufmann, D. ve Pritchett, L. (1997). Civil liberties, democracy, and the performance of govenrment projects. World Bank Economic Review 11(2), 219-242.
  • Knack, S., ve Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.
  • Knack, S. (2000). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2504, Temmuz 2008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=632574.
  • Knorringa, P. ve van Staveren, I. (2006). Social capital for industrial development: operationalizing the concept. Report prepared for COMPID Research Programme, Vienna: UNIDO.
  • Knowles, S. ve Weatherston, C. (2006). Informal institutions and cross- country income differences. University of Nottingham, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 06/06. Temmuz 2009, http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/credit/research/papers/cp0606. pdf
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Northwestern University Discussion Paper, No. 225, June 1976.
  • http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/225.pdf
  • Loury, G. (1987). Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy and Policy, 5(1), 249-271.
  • Moore, M. (1994). How difficult is it to construct market relations? A commentary on Platteau. Journal of development studies, 30, 818-830.
  • Narayan, D. ve Pritchett, L. (1996). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No: 1796. Eylül 2008, http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1796.html.
  • Okay, N. C. (2004). Gary Becker'in iktisadi modelleri üzerine. Pivolka, 3(11), 17-18. Şubat 2009, http://www.elyadal.org/PiVOLKA/11/becker.htm.
  • Portes, A. ve Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 26, May-June, 18-21.
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. Temmuz 2008, EBSCO Veri tabanı.
  • Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1-12.
  • Putnam, R. Leonardi, R. ve Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65-78.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Secor, A.C. ve O’Loughlin, J. (2005). Social and political trust in İstanbul and Moscow: a
  • comparative analysis of individual and neighbourhood effects. Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers). Ağustos 2009, http://www.uky.edu/AS/Geography/faculty/secoroloughlin2005.pdf
  • Serageldin, I. ve Grootaert, C. (2000). Defining social capital; an integrating view. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (40-58). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • Tabellini, G. (2005). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. CESifo Working Paper, No. 1492.Mart 2009,
  • http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1492.pdf.
  • Westlund, H. (2006). Social capital as capital in the economic sense. Social capital in the knowledge economy: Theory and empirics içinde (27-38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Whiteley, P. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 441–466.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27 (2), 151-208.
  • Woolcock, M. ve Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2), 225–249.
  • WVS (2009). World Values Survey 1981-2008, Official Aggregate v.20090901. World Values Survey Association. Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Eylül 2009, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
  • Wu, Wei-Ping (2004). Transaction cost, social capital and firms’ synergy creation in Chinese business networks: An integrative approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 325–343.
  • Zak, P. ve Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111, 295–321.
  • Kabul Tarihi: 17 Aralık 2009

Disiplinlerarası Ortak Bir Çalışma Alanı Olarak Sosyal Sermaye

Year 2009, Volume: 33 Issue: 2, 248 - 256, 08.03.2010

Feray Erselcan

Abstract

Sosyal sermaye, insanlar arası güven, birlik ve bütünlük duygusuna dayalı olarak, işbirliği ve ortak eylem
potansiyelini harekete geçirmek suretiyle birlikte çalışmayı olanaklı hale getiren, toplumsal gelişimin yanı
sıra ekonomik gelişim açısından da önem arz eden bir kavramdır. Bu çalışmada sosyal sermayeyle ilgili
birbirinden farklı alanlarda yürütülen araştırmalar yakın plana alınmak suretiyle, kuramsal çerçevesi
üzerinde tartışmaların halen sürdüğü, bu nispeten yeni kavramın tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır. Farklı
disiplinler içinde kendi kuram ve yöntemleri ile kavramı tanımlama ve ölçme çabalarını zenginleştiren bu
çalışmaların aynı zamanda disiplinler arası sınırların aşılmasına yaptığı katkı ise kuşkusuz önemlidir.

Keywords

sosyal sermaye ekonomik gelişme güven işbirliği

References

  • Adler, P. ve Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17–40.
  • Arrow, K. (2000). Observations on social capital. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (3- 5).Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Becker, G. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986), The forms of capital. Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education içinde (241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Burt, Ronald S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, Ronald, S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19, 355-374.
  • Burt, Ronald S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement) 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1999). Trust, voluntary association and workable democracy: The contemporary American discourse of civil society. Warren, M.E. (Ed.) Democracy and trust içinde (208-248). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Cooke, P.M. ve Morgan, K. (2000). The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dasgupta, P. (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (325-424). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • Dincer, O. ve Uslaner, E. (2007). Trust and growth. Nota Di Lavoro 73.2007 The Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro Series. Temmuz 2009, http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htm
  • Dobler, C. (2009). The impact of institutions, culture, and religion on per capita income. Hohenheim University Paper Nr. 28/2009, Stutgart. Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2009, http://www.socialcapitalgateway.
  • Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Esasen Dünya Değerler Araştırmaları dışında Türkiye’de sosyal sermayeyi
  • ölçme çabasına giren az sayıda çalışmaya rastlanmaktadır (örn., Secor, A.C.
  • ve O’Loughlin, J., 2005).
  • Fine, B. (2001). Social capital versus social theory: Political economy and social science at the turn of the millennium. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Flora, J. (1998). Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology, 63, 481-506.
  • Foley, M.W. ve Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 141-173.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Güven, sosyal erdemler ve refahın yaratılması. (A. Buğdaycı, Çev.) İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi: 1995.)
  • Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D. ve Sacerdote, B. (2000). The economic approach to social capital. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. 7728, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7728.
  • Grabowski, R. (1998). Development, markets and trust. Journal of International Development, 10, 357-371.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510. 15 Temmuz 2009, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199.
  • Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A Framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35 (1), 3-11.
  • Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50. 10 Temmuz 2009, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134991.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. ve Zingales, L. (2006). Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
  • Hanifan, L. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N. ve Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations; forms and facades of trust. Lane, C. ve Bachman, R. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations; conceptual issues and empirical applications içinde (64-87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huang, F. (2003). Social trust, cooperation, and human capital. Department of Economics, The University of Pennsylvania. 15 Temmuz 2009. http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~fali/hcsc815.pdf
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. Warren, M. (Ed.), Democracy and trust içinde, 88-120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., Diez-Medrano, J., Halman, L. ve Luijkx, R. (Eds.). (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999- 2002 Values Surveys, Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
  • Inglehart, R. ve Welzel, C. (2007). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. (5. Baskı). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Isham, J., Kaufmann, D. ve Pritchett, L. (1997). Civil liberties, democracy, and the performance of govenrment projects. World Bank Economic Review 11(2), 219-242.
  • Knack, S., ve Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.
  • Knack, S. (2000). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2504, Temmuz 2008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=632574.
  • Knorringa, P. ve van Staveren, I. (2006). Social capital for industrial development: operationalizing the concept. Report prepared for COMPID Research Programme, Vienna: UNIDO.
  • Knowles, S. ve Weatherston, C. (2006). Informal institutions and cross- country income differences. University of Nottingham, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 06/06. Temmuz 2009, http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/credit/research/papers/cp0606. pdf
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Northwestern University Discussion Paper, No. 225, June 1976.
  • http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/225.pdf
  • Loury, G. (1987). Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy and Policy, 5(1), 249-271.
  • Moore, M. (1994). How difficult is it to construct market relations? A commentary on Platteau. Journal of development studies, 30, 818-830.
  • Narayan, D. ve Pritchett, L. (1996). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No: 1796. Eylül 2008, http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1796.html.
  • Okay, N. C. (2004). Gary Becker'in iktisadi modelleri üzerine. Pivolka, 3(11), 17-18. Şubat 2009, http://www.elyadal.org/PiVOLKA/11/becker.htm.
  • Portes, A. ve Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 26, May-June, 18-21.
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. Temmuz 2008, EBSCO Veri tabanı.
  • Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1-12.
  • Putnam, R. Leonardi, R. ve Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65-78.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Secor, A.C. ve O’Loughlin, J. (2005). Social and political trust in İstanbul and Moscow: a
  • comparative analysis of individual and neighbourhood effects. Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers). Ağustos 2009, http://www.uky.edu/AS/Geography/faculty/secoroloughlin2005.pdf
  • Serageldin, I. ve Grootaert, C. (2000). Defining social capital; an integrating view. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (Eds.) Social capital; a multifaceted perspective içinde (40-58). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • Tabellini, G. (2005). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. CESifo Working Paper, No. 1492.Mart 2009,
  • http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1492.pdf.
  • Westlund, H. (2006). Social capital as capital in the economic sense. Social capital in the knowledge economy: Theory and empirics içinde (27-38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Whiteley, P. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 441–466.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27 (2), 151-208.
  • Woolcock, M. ve Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2), 225–249.
  • WVS (2009). World Values Survey 1981-2008, Official Aggregate v.20090901. World Values Survey Association. Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Eylül 2009, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
  • Wu, Wei-Ping (2004). Transaction cost, social capital and firms’ synergy creation in Chinese business networks: An integrative approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 325–343.
  • Zak, P. ve Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111, 295–321.
  • Kabul Tarihi: 17 Aralık 2009
There are 66 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Feray Erselcan

Publication Date March 8, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2009Volume: 33 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Erselcan, F. (2010). Disiplinlerarası Ortak Bir Çalışma Alanı Olarak Sosyal Sermaye. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33(2), 248-256.
 Download Cover Image

.