Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2016,
Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2, 1 - 26, 15.12.2016
Öz
The aim of this study is to assess the
image of disability in national press in terms of social model. This study was
conducted with a qualitative method. In the study, four newspapers in Turkey
were selected with purposive sampling method and scanned for the news reports
about people with disability between the years 2005-2010. The data which were collected
in the scope of document examination were resolved with content analysis. By
analyzing the content, 11 main themes and 42 sub-themes were put forward.
Accounts of percentage and frequency of the news reports that were distributed
to the themes were studied as well. When the distribution of 1420 news reports
about people with disability to the years is considered, it is revealed that
the news flow is the most in Sabah and the least in Cumhuriyet newspaper. When
the distribution and the intensity of the news to the themes are considered, a
viewpoint that is far from a social model concept of disability can be
discussed.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Disability Person with Disability Social Model National Press
Kaynakça
- AAIDD (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (Eleventh edition). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Administration for Disabled People (2008). Toplum Özürlülüğü Nasıl Anlıyor? Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayını. ARIKAN, Ç. (2002). Sosyal Model Çerçevesinde Özürlülüğe Yaklaşım. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim, 2, 111-25. BALLAN, M. (2008). Disability and sexuality within social work education in the USA and Canada: The social model of disability as a lens for practice. Social Work Education, 27, 194-202. BİLGİN, N. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. COLERIDGE, P. (1993). Disability, liberation and development. Action on disability and development. Oxford: OXFAM. CONNORS, C., & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s Experiences Of Disability: Pointers To A Social Model Of Childhood Disability. Disability & Society, 22, 19-33. DEAL, M. (2007). Aversive disablism: Subtle prejudice toward disabled persons. Disability & Society, 22, 93-107. Disability Discrimination Act (2005). Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/13/contents. DOWSE, L. (2001). Contesting Practices, Challenging Codes: Self Advocacy, Disability Politics And The Social Model. Disability & Society, 16, 123-141. Employment Center for Disabled People (2015). Engellilere Yönelik Özel Günler. Retrieved from www. engelsizis.kadikoy.bel.tr. FREUND, P. (2001). Bodies, Disability And Spaces: The Social Model and Disabling Spatial Organizations. Disability & Society, 16, 689-706. GOODLEY, D. (2001). Learning Difficulties, The Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16, 207-231. GÖKMEN, F. (2007). Türkiye’de Özürlü Haklarının Gelişimi. Öz-veri, 4, 1085-1106. JANWİTZ, M. (2000). International Encylopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. KARÇKAY, K. (2002). Toplumsal Bir Kimlik Olarak Özürlülük (Uzmanlık tezi). Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, Ankara. KIMBERLIN, E. S. (2009). Political Science Theory and Disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,19, 26-43 MACDONALD, S. J. (2009). Dyslexia. Retrieved from www.interscience.wiley.com. DOI: 10.1002/dys.391. MALEC, F. J., & Moessner, M. A. (2006). Replicated Positive Results for the VCC Model of Vocational Intervention after ABI within the Social Model of Disability. Brain Injury, 20, 227-236. MARSHALL, C., & Rossman, B. G. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research (4 th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub. MATSHEDISHO, R. (2007). Access to Higher Education for Disabled Students in South Africa: A contradictory conjuncture of benevolence, rights and the social model of disability. Disability & Society, 22, 685-699. MCCAUGHEY, J. T., & Strohmer, C. D. (2005). Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 48, 89-99. MCOUAT, C. R. (2011). Inclusion: Classroom Teachers’ Perspectives and Experiences in a Bourdieusian Framework (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. MERCIECA, D., & Mercieca, D. (2010). Opening Research to Intensities: Rethinking Disability Research with Deleuze and Guattari. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44, 79-92. National Autism Center (2009). National Autism Center National Standarts Report. Retrieved from http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/ecard/2009_NSR/. Official Journal (2005). Özürlüler ve Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun. Kanun no: 5378. OSGOOD, E. C. (1959). The representational model and relevant research methods. In S. Pool (ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp.33-88). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ÖZGÖKÇELER, S., & Alper, Y. (2010). Özürlüler Kanunu’nun Sosyal Model Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 33-54. ÖZKALP, E. (2000). Sosyolojiye Giriş. Eskişehir: Eğitim, Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları. RACEA, D., Boxall, K., & Carson, L. (2005). Towards a Dialogue for Practice: Reconciling Social Role Valorization and the Social Model of Disability. Disability & Society, 20, 507-521. SCHALOCK, L. R., & Kiernan, E. W. (1990). Habilitation planning for adults with developmental disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag. SEVERIN, J. W., & Tankard, W. J. (1994). İletişim Kuramları: Kökenleri, Yöntemleri Ve Kitle İletişim Araçlarında Kullanımları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Kibele Sanat Merkezi. SHAKESPEARE, T. (1993). Disabled People’s Self-Organization: A New Social Movement. Disability & Society, 8, 249-264. SWAIN, J., Griffiths, C., & Heyman, B. (2003). Towards A Social Model Approach to Counselling Disabled Clients. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 31, 137-152. THOMAS, C. (2004). How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches. Disability & Society, 19, 569-583. TREGASKIS, C. (2004). Applying the Social Model in Practice: Some Lessons From Countryside Recreation. Disability & Society, 19, 601-611. Turkish Statistical Institute (2003). Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması-2002. Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976, 2006). Fundamental principles of disability. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf. World Health Organization (2016). Word Report on Disability. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/ YAZBECK, M., McVilly, K., & Parmenter, R. T. (2004). Attitudes towards Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 97-111. YILDIRIM, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıl 2016,
Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2, 1 - 26, 15.12.2016
Öz
Kaynakça
- AAIDD (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (Eleventh edition). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Administration for Disabled People (2008). Toplum Özürlülüğü Nasıl Anlıyor? Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayını. ARIKAN, Ç. (2002). Sosyal Model Çerçevesinde Özürlülüğe Yaklaşım. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim, 2, 111-25. BALLAN, M. (2008). Disability and sexuality within social work education in the USA and Canada: The social model of disability as a lens for practice. Social Work Education, 27, 194-202. BİLGİN, N. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. COLERIDGE, P. (1993). Disability, liberation and development. Action on disability and development. Oxford: OXFAM. CONNORS, C., & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s Experiences Of Disability: Pointers To A Social Model Of Childhood Disability. Disability & Society, 22, 19-33. DEAL, M. (2007). Aversive disablism: Subtle prejudice toward disabled persons. Disability & Society, 22, 93-107. Disability Discrimination Act (2005). Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/13/contents. DOWSE, L. (2001). Contesting Practices, Challenging Codes: Self Advocacy, Disability Politics And The Social Model. Disability & Society, 16, 123-141. Employment Center for Disabled People (2015). Engellilere Yönelik Özel Günler. Retrieved from www. engelsizis.kadikoy.bel.tr. FREUND, P. (2001). Bodies, Disability And Spaces: The Social Model and Disabling Spatial Organizations. Disability & Society, 16, 689-706. GOODLEY, D. (2001). Learning Difficulties, The Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16, 207-231. GÖKMEN, F. (2007). Türkiye’de Özürlü Haklarının Gelişimi. Öz-veri, 4, 1085-1106. JANWİTZ, M. (2000). International Encylopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. KARÇKAY, K. (2002). Toplumsal Bir Kimlik Olarak Özürlülük (Uzmanlık tezi). Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, Ankara. KIMBERLIN, E. S. (2009). Political Science Theory and Disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,19, 26-43 MACDONALD, S. J. (2009). Dyslexia. Retrieved from www.interscience.wiley.com. DOI: 10.1002/dys.391. MALEC, F. J., & Moessner, M. A. (2006). Replicated Positive Results for the VCC Model of Vocational Intervention after ABI within the Social Model of Disability. Brain Injury, 20, 227-236. MARSHALL, C., & Rossman, B. G. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research (4 th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub. MATSHEDISHO, R. (2007). Access to Higher Education for Disabled Students in South Africa: A contradictory conjuncture of benevolence, rights and the social model of disability. Disability & Society, 22, 685-699. MCCAUGHEY, J. T., & Strohmer, C. D. (2005). Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 48, 89-99. MCOUAT, C. R. (2011). Inclusion: Classroom Teachers’ Perspectives and Experiences in a Bourdieusian Framework (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. MERCIECA, D., & Mercieca, D. (2010). Opening Research to Intensities: Rethinking Disability Research with Deleuze and Guattari. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44, 79-92. National Autism Center (2009). National Autism Center National Standarts Report. Retrieved from http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/ecard/2009_NSR/. Official Journal (2005). Özürlüler ve Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun. Kanun no: 5378. OSGOOD, E. C. (1959). The representational model and relevant research methods. In S. Pool (ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp.33-88). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ÖZGÖKÇELER, S., & Alper, Y. (2010). Özürlüler Kanunu’nun Sosyal Model Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 33-54. ÖZKALP, E. (2000). Sosyolojiye Giriş. Eskişehir: Eğitim, Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları. RACEA, D., Boxall, K., & Carson, L. (2005). Towards a Dialogue for Practice: Reconciling Social Role Valorization and the Social Model of Disability. Disability & Society, 20, 507-521. SCHALOCK, L. R., & Kiernan, E. W. (1990). Habilitation planning for adults with developmental disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag. SEVERIN, J. W., & Tankard, W. J. (1994). İletişim Kuramları: Kökenleri, Yöntemleri Ve Kitle İletişim Araçlarında Kullanımları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Kibele Sanat Merkezi. SHAKESPEARE, T. (1993). Disabled People’s Self-Organization: A New Social Movement. Disability & Society, 8, 249-264. SWAIN, J., Griffiths, C., & Heyman, B. (2003). Towards A Social Model Approach to Counselling Disabled Clients. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 31, 137-152. THOMAS, C. (2004). How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches. Disability & Society, 19, 569-583. TREGASKIS, C. (2004). Applying the Social Model in Practice: Some Lessons From Countryside Recreation. Disability & Society, 19, 601-611. Turkish Statistical Institute (2003). Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması-2002. Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976, 2006). Fundamental principles of disability. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf. World Health Organization (2016). Word Report on Disability. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/ YAZBECK, M., McVilly, K., & Parmenter, R. T. (2004). Attitudes towards Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 97-111. YILDIRIM, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 15 Aralık 2016 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2016Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2 |
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.